Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown of the Gods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 18:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Crown of the Gods

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreleased non-notable video game failing to pass WP:GNG with multiple reliable secondary in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Cannot locate any sources that are reliable. The current sources in the article do not appear to be reliable or in-depth. The majority are very short and none are in-depth reviews as the game is not released. A lot of information appears to come directly from developer (Kickstarter, interview, announcements) so not independent. Appears to be WP:TOOSOON until release and coverage of reliable sources. Probably suitable to be userfied until such time.The author appear to be closely connected with the game (which is not in itself an issue, but the article does go into excessive gameplay details). — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 16:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. —  HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 16:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. czar  18:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now per the nominator. The less than 1,000 likes on this game's official Facebook page should be an additional indication of this game's lack of notability. 和DITOR  E tails 00:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's perhaps not even solid in-depth third-party sourcing overall. Draft and userfy if needed though, SwisterTwister   talk  05:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.