Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowthorne Natural History Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Crowthorne Natural History Society

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ORG easily. All of the coverage I have found on this society doesn’t extend beyond the local area (, from WP:ORG: “Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability”,) and of that local coverage all of it seems to be trivial mention (“Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability”). Did plan to work with author to try and find some way to improve the article, but author has been inactive since late January of this year. Otumba (talk) 15:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  —Otumba (talk) 15:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  --  treelo  radda  15:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No way is an organisation notable because someone who has a Wikipedia article was a member once. Equally non-notable outcome on Ghits/Gnews. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN. unless the article is expanded suffiently to establish notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.