Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croydon Aircraft Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 00:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Croydon Aircraft Company

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable commercial organisation. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable. Madrid 2020 (talk) 22:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. - gadfium  22:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep several references already in article, others can be added - most coverage I could find didn't provide much detail, but is more than trivial and probably enough for an article to meet guidelines. Peter E. James (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * There is insufficient refs to meet WP:CORP. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - The Croydon Aircraft Company have built aircraft, which makes them a manufacturer and therefore they should be notable enough to sustain an article. Mjroots (talk) 17:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.