Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croydon City Arrows SC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Croydon City Arrows SC
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  23:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

None of the sources establish notability (WP:GNG). Couldn't find any online either. ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  01:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: It would helpful if some sources were produced to counter the nomination statement. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Australia. –––  GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  01:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a semi-professional football club that has been around for well over 50 years and has played at various levels including the top tier of football in Victoria. The club has also produced several former Socceroo's. There must be loads of sources especially in print media. Simione001 (talk) 02:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Simione001, was Victorian state champion, willing to AGF that there are offline sources. GiantSnowman 19:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Draftify I agree that there are a few ofline sources given that I found a few on Archive.com here. If you consider these then you could probably find something. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above. I also found, and  among many more sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * thanks for that, ill withdraw ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  23:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.