Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crucian (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  03:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Crucian (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 22:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 22:58, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- there's nothing to merge as the article does not list independent RS on the topic. One of the sources is an "official supplement for the 3.5 edition of the Dungeons & Dragons roleplaying game" and the other is an in-universe publication. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. I'll note that K.e.coffman's opinion is not policy based, in that primary sources are perfectly acceptable to verify uncontroversial content; they just don't count towards notability. Jclemens (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Jclemens (talk) 05:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.