Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise.co.uk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. I'm not sure if the circumstances surrounding this domain's purchase is notable enough for a standalone article but if someone wants to write one with sources from a neutral point of view then go for it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Cruise.co.uk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to fail WP:COMPANY. Google search failed to find coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources other than trivial mentions (nothing substantial about the company was found). Ks0stm (T•C•G) 17:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 16:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I guess the fact about the domain name is vaguely interesting. The problem is that the rest of the article sounds a little bit promotional, which coupled with the fact that the primary contributor has done little else makes it look like it may be somebody who works for/has been on one of these cruises. Bob talk 07:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Just clarifying this...while the domain name purchase did receive some coverage, it is not enough to prove notability for the company as a company. This thus fails to meet WP:COMPANY standards. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 22:04, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - agree with Bob above, looks self promotional by a cruise participant. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.