Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Cruise International

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Most coverage seems to be self-published or churnalism. Numerous paid accounts have been involved in creating and editing the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article on a niche magazine, with substantial WP:SPA editing over the years (,, etc.). Notability is not inherited from hosted award events or from celebrities commissioned to present these awards. I am not seeing the coverage about the magazine which would be needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.