Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruiseable


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:15, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Cruiseable

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I frankly would've PRODed too, but in case this gets removed and also if we need G4 later, here we are; my searches and examinations are noticeably simply finding unacceptable sources such as press releases, advertorial and PR speak, trivial passing mentions and the like; there's nothing actually substantial here. SwisterTwister  talk  20:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – This source provides significant coverage, but not finding other sources that do. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. North America1000 07:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As NorthAmerica says, there do not seem to be multiple reliable sources that give this subject significant coverage. Vanamonde (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- advertorial content & insufficient coverage in RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:13, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.