Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crusader warfare

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete CDC   (talk)  23:07, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Crusader warfare
Tagged for speedy deletion because "patent nonsense. This is such drivel - there are many, many better contributions about military. The name comes from bad journalism." It's not patent nonsense, because I understand it. The other things don't make it a speedy candidate. No vote. Kappa 07:52, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete DDerby 09:34, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-topic, reads like something out of a game manual. - Mustafaa 10:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge Redirect to Crusades. Radiant_* 14:14, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing here worth adding to the Crusades article. Mwanner 11:54, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Would add nothing to Crusades. - Jpo 12:47, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article tries to generalise from certain historical events. It is simply inept sociology, not factual.--Doc Glasgow 14:50, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Patent nonsense. I originally put on it. Pavel Vozenilek 18:52, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and create redirect to Crusades - no need to save this in the edit history. Dsmdgold 19:07, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.