Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crush Deluxe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. @pple complain 17:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Crush Deluxe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Potentially not notable game; not written in an encyclopedic manner. OSbornarf 02:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Anything that starts off with "promotional blurb" deserves to be deleted off of wiki. Renee 02:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- OSbornarf 02:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Author' - Perhaps I have been premature in committing my changes and certainly I have violated wiki etiquette with my initial entries. This is my first foray into editing a Wiki article and I apologise for my obvious gafs.  I didn't realise, and I am impressed, that the Wikipedia review process would be so thorough and so prompt.  Is it possible to leave this article offline until I feel it is ready for review?  In response to the query if the game is notable I wonder what the criteria for that classification would be? Cannonade 02:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Welcome! You could certainly move it to your user area (i.e. copy and paste to User:Cannonade/Crush Deluxe - others will be able to contribute, but it won't be in the main article name space.) The game would need to be mentioned, in, say, a majorish newspaper or magazine, or online, in a rather major website, usually one with editorial oversight. You might want to take a look at other video game articles in something like Category:Windows_games. Happy editing! OSbornarf 02:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks OSborn - I have moved the content to the user area and will edit it there. Do I need to clear the content on the live page or can this stay around till I am ready to commit my changes?  (Is this the appropriate place for these questions ?) Cannonade 02:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Best place to get answers would probably be Questions - I'm don't really know about that. Thanks, OSbornarf 03:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't know about the moving etc, but as it is, and possibly as it will be, this article is NN and should be deleted... Spawn Man 03:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't see that this meets notability guideline. If creator could establish notability through verifiable sources it would be helpful. Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim  02:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. In no way it deserves an article on WP. Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  08:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.