Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crutch (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 16:06, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Crutch (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

no claim to notability, lacks coverage in reliable sources. prod removed without reason. Duffbeerforme (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The article has now been expanded and properly sourced per film MOS. It has received some interesting critical response... some good.... some bad. Seems to just tickle over the scales of WP:NF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Michael Q Schmidt beat me to most of the expansion and sourcing needed on the article, but I found and added a review from the New York Times. Raven1977 (talk) 22:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: The new refs help ascertain notability for me, plus it is called "Crutch" ;) Ryan 4314   (talk) 03:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * strong keep. The movie attained enough bad reviews to make it notabile. Mrathel (talk) 22:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.