Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crux (Ramez Naam novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Nexus Trilogy. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Crux (Ramez Naam novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've merged all information from Crux and Apex into the Nexus article, which I renamed to 'The Nexus Trilogy'. There is no need to have three separate articles (yet). There would be problems with overlap and missing information in all three articles. Momo Monitor (talk) 23:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as my searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect per my reasoning at Articles for deletion/Apex (Ramez Naam novel). Jclemens (talk) 01:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable, significant sources are available. VanEman (talk) 03:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep notable author, and some of those are reliable sources it appears. DaltonCastle (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect: notable author and notable novel. Not sure if there's any advantage in having one article for all three novels over having it split up. --Fixuture (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Nexus Trilogy. While the book is independently notable, as long as all relevant content is merged, there is no need to maintain three articles as long as the consolidated article does not get too long and needs a re-split per WP:SS. This did not need an AfD and could have been done editorially.  Sandstein   07:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.