Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crux Mathematicorum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Crux Mathematicorum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Journal does not appear to be notable. Could not find non-trivial discussion of it in reliable independent secondary sources. Facebook, Scribd, and references to the journal itself. KDS 4444 Talk  06:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I expanded the article with a primary source for its history and a couple of secondary sources. It appears to be the top journal on mathematical problem-solving, so I think it passes WP:NJournal #1 and #3. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with David Eppstein. This is a very special journal, but because it does not publish original research, it will not pop up in the usual places that we use for notability checking. Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The journal has been cited in 24 WP articles. — Rgdboer (talk) 21:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as this seems convincing enough. SwisterTwister   talk  00:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.