Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crux Pectoralis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pectoral cross. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Crux Pectoralis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Utterly non notable internal "law" of the Catholic Church with no real impact on the world (the vestimentary attributes of one subclass of priests). No significant attention in reliable, independent sources. Fram (talk) 06:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Pectoral_cross, and possible merge from history, but I'm not sure if there is much there to merge. Many motu proprio are in fact notable (see Summorum Pontificum for the most notable one of this century), but this one does not appear to be, which was actually somewhat shocking to me: reforms of the cardinialite are typically very well documented in both religious and the secular press, but I don't find that here. The reform is significant in some ways, as it can be interpreted in retrospect a move towards a uniformly episcopal College of Cardinals, but at the end of the day, it is just about the clothing choices of the most notable class of clerics in the church. That can be covered elsewhere equally well as in its own article. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * merge/redirect to Pectoral_cross as I would agree there is not enough substance (and especially external reference) here to warrant its own article. Mangoe (talk) 16:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Agree with merge/redirect to Pectoral_cross.--Jahaza (talk) 15:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.