Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cry Baby's Extra Clutter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Cry Baby (album). Joyous! | Talk 02:26, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Cry Baby's Extra Clutter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable. has not charted. not yet released. few references. and the tracks are already available elsewhere - the "Extra Clutter" are the bonus tracks from the album "Cry Baby" - hence the name, Cry Baby's Extra Clutter. Kellymoat (talk) 11:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge With Cry Baby (album). fails on WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks, JohnTombs48 (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Per WP:SOCKSTRIKE


 * MERGE A blatant entertainment promotional. Better suited for the artist's page, or artist's already existing album page.WP:Promotion
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I added the information from "Extra Clutter" to the "Cry Baby" page. It is safe to move/delete when the time comes.Kellymoat (talk) 16:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * KEEP - I've seen far less relevant EPs have a page of their own. For the cleanliness of the page, I propose it to be its own page. If it charts or has mild success, it will clutter up the Crybaby page-- Jennica ✿ Ping Me! 23:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I hate using "but others are doing it" as justification. I find that there are way too many pages wasting space on WP. But, that is a separate discussion for a different arena. Do you think that the fact that this has been posted for 2 weeks and has gotten very little to no input is a sign of "not notable"? Kellymoat (talk) 00:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * - yes you definitely have a point there. It is not very notable.-- Jennica ✿ Ping Me! 01:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 07:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.