Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cry more noob


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer  T - 21:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Cry more noob
Non-notable phrase.. --Mysidia (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Nn. --Blackcap | talk 00:21, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * You can cry more, n00b, when your article is deleted. &hearts;purplefeltangel (talk) &hearts; (Contributions) 00:26, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -GregAsche (talk) 00:34, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Nonsense. / Peter Isotalo 13:27, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think it can be speedied, at least not as nonsense, because it is coherent text. --Blackcap | talk 17:28, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I've seen coherent stuff speedied for being nonsense. I could write, "Once there was a banana who decided that he wanted to drink a cup of tea," and that's perfectly coherent, but it's also nonsense. &hearts;purplefeltangel (talk) &hearts; (Contributions) 22:43, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * No no no, the canonical coherent-but-nonsensical sentence is Noam Chomsky's "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously." --Calton | Talk 07:40, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * That's true, but that's nonsensical and incoherent, whereas this is sensical, coherent, and exists in real life as an actual saying (as far as I know, not being a gamer myself), and therefore is not patent nonsense or speediable. --Blackcap | talk 16:29, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * "I want more pancakes" is probably even more common and perfectly real, yet we would never accept it as an article. This is no different. / Peter Isotalo 06:51, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Note that I'm voting delete on this. Obviously it shouldn't be kept, I'm just saying that it can't be speedied. As to your example, "I want more pancakes" is a personal desire and is thus non-notable and is also speediable under G3 amd A1, but is not patent nonsense, which is how all this got started. This article relates to an actual phrase used by a number of people (presumably), fits under no WP:CSD, and thus cannot be speedied. A precedent: Articles for deletion/Lo and behold. Unspeediable expression, except this one was notable enough to go into Wiktionary. --Blackcap | talk 17:52, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Also, "I want pancakes" is hardly a saying, which this article is claiming to be. --Blackcap | talk 18:01, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable phrase. Carbonite | Talk 12:29, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Akin to All your base are belong to us. I too use these terms. - Unsigned post by 202.78.85.154. This is this user's first post. --Blackcap
 * Delete on non notability. Shauri 15:00, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - oft-used phrase ··gracefool |&#9786; 17:20, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 11:14, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Cry more noob
kind of neoligism. Then agian, I don't play MMORPGs. Kind of attack as well  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 22:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as recreation of deleted content. bikeable (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Keep time has passed since last deletion, usage has spread and evolved


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.