Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryovac GmbH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Cryovac GmbH

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced. There seems to be no significant coverage. — Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 23:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete There don't seem to be any sources. I couldn't find anything. Tried searching in German too. Search is complicated a bit by the fact that Cryovac is also a brand of food packaging owned by Sealed Air. Vexations (talk) 23:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. A reasonable number of these GmbH pages are too self-promotional and non-notable. Dorama285 00:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Vexations above, so barring any available quality sourcing that we've missed, the company is non-notable. PK650 (talk) 22:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, Article is without any sources.I could not find enough coverage, not notable. Alex-h (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as we're not a catalog. Tymon. r  Do you have any questions?  00:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article with substantial edits by and with an advertising tone ("leading supplier", "real advantage", etc.) but absence of sources. Searches are finding distributor listings but not the substantial coverage required for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 07:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.