Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptic Campaigns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 13:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Cryptic Campaigns

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A single review in a niche magazine. Rpg.net is just a database listing. Other sources I could find were similar: commercial sites like Amazon, fansites, database listings... but no sources actually establishing notability. Since this is a supplement to a game that doesn't even have an article apparently, no good redirect target. Fram (talk) 12:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:G8. This article is dependent on the article of the roleplaying game, which doesn't exist, making this a "Page dependent on a non-existent or deleted page". Not a very active user (talk) 13:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per usual for these, the Dragon review is the only coverage this game received, and even that was not much. The RPG.net source is, of course, not useful for establishing notability, as it is nothing more than a database entry for the product, and, in this case, doesn't even appear to be about the correct game.  Complete failure of the WP:GNG.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 12:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom, more of the usual RPG cruft. No copies listed in Worldcat. How many pages is this thing? Is this a book, a booklet, or a pamphlet? Why would we assume that an ephemeral whatever for a non-notable product line based of a barely notable game system is notable? What a waste of time. Grayfell (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.