Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CryptoLink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

CryptoLink

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

notability was questioned in June 2010 by another user, with no response since, and I still can't any further info on the net. The only information I can find is a blog from May 2010 claiming that this project will be starting in 2010 sometime - http://blog.grc.com/2010/05/19/may-2010/ Whippen (talk) 10:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: No indication of notability, no reliable sources. The only references to be found on Google are one GRC blog entry and people discussing this entry. The Wikipedia article was originally mostly a copy of said blog entry. -- intgr [talk] 14:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
 * Delete. The text is also flagrantly promotional: The motivation for creating CryptoLink was born out of the frustration and complex configuration required for other popular VPN products, such as OpenVPN. Gibson realised the desire of many people for a simple, user-friendly and robust VPN solution that would not require any technical knowledge or detailed understanding of VPNs to install and configure. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - for now. At present this is a statement of intent, not a piece of software. Steve Gibson is certainly notable and he's done notable things in the past. If he is successful in achieving his intent, there won't be any issue about having an article. Right now it's premature. &mdash; HowardBGolden (talk) 16:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.