Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Aid Israel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Crypto Aid Israel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:ADMASQ, fails WP:NCORP, based wholly on sentiment for the current horrible Hamas-Israeli conflict. WP:NOTNEWS applies 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Organizations, Terrorism, Business, Israel,  and Palestine. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: aside from the nom reasons, WP:PROMO very much applies. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:ARTSPAM Does not meet inclusion criteria. Preys, purposefully or not, on the anguish we feel over the latest war. WP:G11 was declined. I cannot be objective, (about the G11ness) but I think it was G11able. came here from Liz's  talk. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: PROMO. This reads like an ad for the effort. Oaktree b (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Cryptowashing of a horrible event should never be entertained here, nor should any kind of aid ever be stuck in a math problem only a computer can solve. WP:PROMO trash.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete This article definitely looks like some sort of advertisement or promoting a business. Nonetheless, this article doesn't stand to a neutral point of view. Geko72290 (talk) 19:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I understand why the speedy was declined, but the sourcing for this initiative isn't there. Star   Mississippi  00:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Source analysis shows that it does not satisfy general notability because the sources are not independent.  All of the sources are publications of the cryptocurrency community, and therefore have a conflict of interest.  The source analysis is:


 * Delete. Promotional. No evidence of level of in-depth coverage in WP:RS necessary to meet notability requirements. Sourced to unreliable crypocurrency websites. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * There is discussion on my talk page regarding the article. I've requested CSD to the article. Toadette  (let's chat together) 06:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.