Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Leaks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  12:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Crypto Leaks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Only secondary reliable SIGCOV only trivially mentions Crypto Leaks. The artticle almost exclusively covers one single leak and the consequences it had for the law firm.

The content would be better served in an article about the law firm and/or the leak, if that would be notable as a stand-alone article. AlexandraAVX (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC) \
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Cryptocurrency. AlexandraAVX (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Organizations.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Might be a case for the lawyer/law firm to have an article, this anonymous group is mostly mentioned in article surrounding the lawyer. I don't see enough notability on their own. Oaktree b (talk) 16:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Another WikiLeaks clone, just with added Web 3.0 baggage to try to compete.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.