Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptocentrus caeruleopunctatus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Cryptocentrus caeruleopunctatus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks enough information, only has a few words ToonLucas22 (talk) 17:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and suggest criterion 1 speedy keep. Being a stub, even a bad stub, isn't cause for deletion. This article was nominated literally two minutes after initial creation. And there's no doubt that it's a valid topic for an article: a validly-described species of fish on the IUCN Red List (in under a minute of searching, here is a book reference if more is needed). Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: per above. Vrac (talk) 18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.