Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptomechanics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Cryptomechanics

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Neologism which gives no GBook or GNews hits whatsoever, and other searches turn up Google traps or false hits, primarily on mechanical cryptography. Mangoe (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: none of the online citations in the article even mention the term, no Google News/Books hit. No indication that this topic exists, let alone that it is notable. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete since the term does not seem to have been used in any book or scholarly article. Mathsci (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.