Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Kung Minkoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. RL0919 (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Crystal Kung Minkoff

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reality show performer. Not enough in-depth coverage outside of the show to show they have any notability outside the production. Should probably be a redirect, but was reverted.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry  Talk   Edits  03:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 03:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. When I read things like this: According to Bravo, Crystal and Rob live in Bel Air and Crystal has formal culinary training, and she has a passion for cooking and throwing extravagant parties. She is an enjoys skier and loves to play tennis. in the encyclopedia it is often signal that there is either promotional editing going on or there is not enough info out there to substantiate notability for a stand alone article. This too: Kung is a 76th-generation descendant of is filler. Fails WP:NACTOR Netherzone (talk) 20:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you can assess secondary coverage and not the quality of the current text, which can be changed? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Another Believer hello! just seeing your note now. When I did a BEFORE search, all I came up with was social media, something called "Facebook Wedding Style", and primary sources like interviews without editorial content. I also found low-quality sources similar to what is in the article. I found things that looked like native advertising - that appears to be an article but with the byline "produced by digital editors" or no byline, which makes me think it's PR placement, and not real reporting or journalism. Please improve the article if you can find independent secondary SIGCOV in reliable sources. Netherzone (talk) 14:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect as suggested by, for the reasons given there. There's no encyclopedic information. I'm not sure it's promotional  , but its not a basis for an encyclopedia article  DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.