Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CsUnit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈discuss 02:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

CsUnit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable article for software as the best I found was this, this and this and this hasn't improve since starting in March 2007. Pinging and. SwisterTwister  talk  07:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * redircet or merge and redirect to Test automation, List of unit testing frameworks or similar. Feel free to ping me for any merging. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are 30-odd .NET test frameworks listed in List of unit testing frameworks so I assumed this was yet another non-notable one. However it turns up in Google Scholar and is often mentioned along with NUnit as the only other .NET unit test framework in the paper. I've added two references to further reading. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.