Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CsUnit (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of unit testing frameworks.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 19:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

CsUnit
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Has one ref from a predatory journal. -- Wiki Linuz  ( talk ) 04:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Comment. I don't know enough about the sources to assess the quality of the journal sources and whether the nominator would say they are predatory, but there appears to be sufficient scholarly coverage of this subject. However, my lack of knowledge prevents me from !voting. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find anything significant. The one ref I was talking about is this, which is inactive (it's also a low-quality journal so fails RS). -- Wiki Linuz  ( talk ) 02:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. International Journal of Research in Computer Science has indeed been identified as predatory. Topic is not notable and article lacks valid sources. Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 03:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List_of_unit_testing_frameworks: where it is already covered in as much detail as is warranted by the limited sources. Owen&times; &#9742;  12:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of unit testing frameworks: The framework is notable enough to be frequently mentioned in online and literary sources from the early-mid 2000s (e.g.,, ), but not in any depth, and certainly not with any greater coverage than its contemporaries. It should be redirected to preserve the edit history, regardless, and sources used to back up its entry at the list article, where a short description would be plenty considering the lack of detailed coverage. Recon  rabbit  16:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.