Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuban assistance to the FSLN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Cuban assistance to the FSLN

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No references for the core of the article. Seemingly no evidence to back up that this happened. There are two references in the article, pertaining to incidents, but none of them support the core premise the article is discussing. Canterbury Tail  talk  12:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Material which is not a paean to Cuba is already fully covered in salient articles. CFork of Sandinista (also unreferenced in that article).   And FSLN  In fact,  this article has absolutely nothing of substance which was not already in other articles, and just as unreferenced.  Using multiple articles for the same unreferenced material is quite apt to lead to deletion of the worst ones. Collect (talk) 10:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I created this article after reading: "This article may be too long to comfortably read and navigate. Please consider splitting content into sub-articles and using this article for a summary of the key points of the subject." at the top of the Sandinista National Liberation Front article. So that's what I did. I have now added core references "to back up that this happened", as per CT's complaint. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And why when it was already in several articles did it need yet one more? Collect (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The only article I saw this material in was FSLN, where I was asked to split "content into sub-articles" because of the length of the article. This is what I have done; I saw a section called "Cuban assistance to the FSLN", I moved its content to a new article and condensed the original text. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 14:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Seems okay to me. I only AfDed it due to the lack of references to support whether it happpened(s) or not. Those have been provided so my issue with the article is fine. Canterbury Tail   talk  15:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Lapsed Pacifist and because the references now appear to be in place.--Vintagekits (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'll look up a book I have on Cuban history to add some more detail. Fences and windows (talk) 01:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.