Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuban nobility


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Apologies, I've forgot one late comment. Also it needs some serious improvements too in order to avoid any potential future AFDs. JForget 17:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Cuban nobility

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article hasn't really been in improved on since November 2007 and is written like a student wrote this for high school English class. There aren't many sources on this topic and if there were, it should just be incorporated in History of Cuba and History of Spain. BrianY (talk) 03:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * keep-valid topic, just needs a rewrite and sourcing. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 12:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree. I have no love for white Cubans, and given their vocal support of their interests, I can only imagine they are too busy drinking Sangria and reminiscing about the good old days before the evil Castro to contribute to this article, but this topic is valid. Anarchangel (talk) 15:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is something people might want to look up.  Yes, the article needs improving, but there are a lot of articles like this.  If they are here and someone reads it who knows of sources, he/she is likely to improve it.  Also it does no harm having the article.--Toddy1 (talk) 04:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.