Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cube26


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 14:38, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Cube26

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional and non notable. Does not meet WP:NCORP  DGG ( talk ) 06:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP amd WP:ORGIND. Classic start-up description. scope_creep (talk) 07:50, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - So there is a great deal of coverage on Cube26. Most of it is removed for failing not reliable or not independent. Pretty much of all of the remainder fails because it is almost entirely talking about its takeover or funding, with only a couple of lines devoted to the actual company. NDTV Source (also has another article with link inside) however gives a reasonable amount of coverage, seemingly satisfying the various criteria. There are also some reasonable sources discussing one product of its, but again not really mentioning the company, which I viewed as sort of a counter-part issue of O1E. However, with so much of this around, I wouldn't be shocked to find at least one more reasonable source somewhere that changes my !vote. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: I added text on the recent acquisition of the company by Paytm, of which some coverage is available. However, neither that nor the available coverage of funding announcements and the company's previous ventures in gesture-based device control,, in OEM software and in phone and IoT hardware seem to me to rise above the routine propositional coverage of a firm seeking a sustainable business line. I am not seeing enough to demonstrate lasting encyclopaedic notability as per WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This is far from the depth or persistence of coverage demanded by even basic compliance with WP:NCORP. Accesscrawl (talk) 10:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.