Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cube inscribed in a sphere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Cube inscribed in a sphere

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article which makes heavy weather of a result which is basically a one line application of Pythagoras. Also we tend not to have articles which are proof. Salix (talk): 08:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a sort of trivial mathematical consequence. The article does not claim why this relationship is notable.  WP:MILL... We could have thousands of articles with trivial mathematical consequences such as this one. Gigs (talk) 09:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete How hard would it be to do a quick merge-and-redir? It could easily be covered in some other, more general Pythagoras article (whatever that may be). flaminglawyer 16:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point it could redirect to Cube. --Salix (talk): 17:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete As Salix says, formula for radius of circumscribed sphere is already given in cube article. Derivation is not sufficiently notable to merit its own article. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.