Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CubicExplorer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

CubicExplorer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't assert notability with reliable sources. ❤ Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  ( 偉特 ) 00:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Search engine results show no really reliable sources; notability certainly isn't asserted.  dci  &#124;  TALK   02:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I managed to find a few brief mentions of the software, like this New Zealand PC World article, but nothing that qualifies as extensive. Fails to meet the general notability guideline.-- xanchester  (t)  00:56, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.