Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Cubika

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully we can now get resolution. Boleyn (talk) 16:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  01:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing notable about them that I can find. Cinteotl (talk) 09:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - software company article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in multiple RS sources. Only ref is a deadlink, but even if it were good, would not on its own be sufficient to establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 03:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.