Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubit Accounting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fails WP:GNG -Scottywong | spout _ 18:21, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Cubit Accounting

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article subject does not appear to be notable as per WP:N. TOW talk  02:27, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Articles has no independent sources which give significant coverage, and I could not find any online. Article fails Wikipedia precedent on software notability. NJ Wine (talk) 03:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Added references are largely self-published.  No reliable 3rd party source material can be found.  --HighKing (talk) 12:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

response
But there are links in the article itself? - And surely the notability is evident from the updated/amended content itself? - If I am wrong please take the time to explain it in plain simple language. Notability: The total source code consists of millions of lines of code. Just the initial core module: http://www.ohloh.net/p/Accounting-123 - estimated project cost $8,429,584 and that is only 10% of the source code. Surely that is significant or even notable? (btw - accounting-123 = cubit) If my article entry is not written well enough, please help me with it? or if I am wrong, I can accept that but explain it to me so I can understand it :)