Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubus (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus was clear even prior to the relisting. -- Kinu  t/c 23:57, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Cubus
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG - could not find significant coverage in reliable non-primary sources. Some coverage exists, but not beyond brief current events articles, and not beyond 2009, the year this brand was introduced. GregorB (talk) 11:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of wp:notability. Of the 4 references, one is their own web site, one is an article on a store opening, one goes to a page them doesn't even mention them, and one is a dead link. North8000 (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete for the same reasons as in 2009, only more so.$undefined$ pablo 14:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, it's not sufficiently notable. The article is basically the same blob of advertizing as the previously speedily deleted version, so there's obviously no apparent potential. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 09:07, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  02:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable topic, fails WP:GNG. TBrandley 02:53, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.