Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuddle bitch

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 23:19 (UTC)

Cuddle bitch, Intellectual whore, & Intellectual Whore
A bunch of articles created by the same anon editor, seemingly for the promotion of a dating service. Delete all of them. JeremyA 01:37, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (speedy?) --BaronLarf 01:45, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete speedsomely I was the one rv'ing to speedy tags which were repeatedly removed until we finished up here. I really don't think that the 'text' that goes with the link makes this something other than a 'single external link' coupled with a 'very short article with little or no context'. -Splash 02:00, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all three. Then write an article on the widely understood concept of the "intellectual whore"-as-smart person who manufactures an opinion for the highest bidder. -- BD2412 talk 02:21, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
 * Keep Remove the link, of course. Samboy 02:23, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) Neutral. Merge into Ladder theory Samboy 05:35, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. It is a widely subscribed-to theory, despite being somewhat tongue-in-cheek. Also, the said article has generated some sort of fame in internet circles. Of course, make Intellectual Whore redirect to Intellectual whore. Alternatively, rename to Intellectual whore (sarcasm) or something similar, and add the popular concept of an intellectual whore per User:BD2412. -Hmib 03:26, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all as neologisms. Denni &#9775; 03:59, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
 * Merge into Ladder theory (where it probably already is) and redirect or delete. Christopher Parham (talk) 05:33, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
 * Delete. --WikiFan04ß 2:12, 22 Jun 2005 (CDT)
 * Delete all, neologisms. JamesBurns 07:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ladder Theory. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 07:56, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Donutz 17:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Neologism and spam. Delete all, possibly redirect Intellectual whore to Ladder Theory. - Mike Rosoft 20:28, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I strongly disagree with a redirect of intellectual whore to ladder theory. While the term is used there, that is hardly its predominant use (even that article notes that it refers to a "political abuse of scholarship"). It is a concept that deserves its own legit article. -- BD2412 talk 21:02, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've never understood that term "blue balls", which seems to recur in a certain kind of mysogynistic literature.  I was about thirty before I had sex with a woman but my love dumplings never changed color or gave me any kind of displeasure. Is there some predisposing medical condition? --21:14, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The pain can actually be intense, but I believe you have to have used friction to inspire intense near fulfillment without performing the act (there is no male nudity involved in acts that inspire "blue balls"). Despite the pain, at the time, one can't help but continue to be involved. --Habap 21:23, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's a circumcised penis thing. Friction has never been a problem for me. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 08:31, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete cuddle bitch as neologism. Intellectual whore is not a neologism, as it has been around since at least the advent of the Ladder Theory. If someone wants to create a new article and disambiguation page for intellectual whore, I would support it. --Habap 21:23, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (speedy) --Tagishsimon (talk)
 * Comment. Redirect to Ladder Theory may be appropriate after review. No vote at this time. hydnjo talk 00:57, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all three. Unencyclopedic, no third-party sources available. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:09, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Laddertheorycruft. &mdash; Phil Welch 05:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.