Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CuencaMonster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   A7 NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

CuencaMonster

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Despite author's protest, the page does not indicate why the subject is notable. Furthermore, that the subject is in fact not notable is borne out by the 17 googlehits, most of which aren't about this company, and the ones that are come from the company website or from directory listings. Drmies (talk) 21:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD A7. -- Finngall  talk  22:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would agree with the CSD but since it has been challenged I don't mind keeping it here - no rush. Contrary to comments on the discussion page notability is not asserted fully and certainly not verified. JodyBtalk 22:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.