Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult classics toys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   01:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Cult classics toys
Blatant advertisement, non notable, poorly done. It fails WP:CORP. That's all I can say. Adambiswanger1 15:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Personally, I think you should have PROD it first, but eh. Yanksox 15:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Barely makes sense. --maru  (talk)  contribs 15:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The general topic of toys for cult films is notable, but there's no reason to think that this one company is notable within that category. Article fails to establish this but clearly works as an advert. Inter lingua  talk 15:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:10, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.