Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult television


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Cult television

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - unsourced indiscriminate collection of information relying entirely on POV and OR. Otto4711 16:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely WP:POV and WP:OR issues. What is the criteria for inclusion?  Also, fails WP:NOT -- s u m n j i m  talk with me·changes 16:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep --Remi 20:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Rewrite from sources is the best I can say, and I imagine that would just be as well done with a blank article as not. Maybe redirect to cult fiction though it's possible some cult television programs aren't fiction.  FrozenPurpleCube 00:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, though the list of programs might be worth deleting. Sources should also be found to justify the intro. matturn 06:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Is something having cult status hard to define? Yes. Does that mean we shouldn't have an article on it? No. Tag it with source requests where appropriate and move on. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: The concept is well-established and the narrative seems fine. The list needs work though as shows like Scrubs seem to be mainstream rather than cult.  Leave the article and work on the list. Colonel Warden 20:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.