Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culter Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per WikiProject_Schools.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   06:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Culter Primary School
Un-notable primary school in Scotland. No articles for similar schools in Wikipedia. No links other than to Peterculter where all the information in this article already exists Catchpole 15:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  Even if high schools are notable, small town primary schools certainly are not. JChap2007 17:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. Articles for similar schools continue to survive AFD. Also it's more than 100 years old, and has been a secondary school for part of that time. And since all the information in this article except for the reference already exist in Peterculter, why are we going through this brutal process? Kappa 18:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Duplicate information is listed at Deletion policy as a problem that does not require deletion. The solution would be to merge and redirect to Peterculter.    Alternately, if the article expands, keep.  JYolkowski // talk 19:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. A hundred year old school should be notable enough to stay. --Daniel Olsen 21:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment and all centenarians are notable, too, right? Carlossuarez46 20:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Notable school, but a one-sentence article is about as stubby as you can get. AgentPeppermint 22:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; provides no claims to notability. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 23:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The very day it was created it was prodded. Then the next day it was nominated for afd. GBYork 14:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; Yes I believe that there is a schools watch page that searches for all school articles and lists them by date. Presumably somebody is watching that page with a wooden stake in their hand, ready to impale any new nn articles that appear. ;-) &mdash; RJH (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually it was created on the 18th April, and then sat for 4 months with no further activity. Catchpole 19:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply - Sorry! I was mistaken -- my bad eyes. GBYork 20:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Article contains no assertion of notability. GRBerry 15:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa, meets the criteria established by the currently proposed guideline for schools. RFerreira 21:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the reasons described at Schools/Arguments, the school is verifiably notable. Silensor 00:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable per the current (proposed} guidelines, pls allow for organic expansion. -- Librarianofages 04:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect a few words does not merit an article. Vegaswikian 19:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn school. Carlossuarez46 20:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the evolving WP:SCHOOL guideline; hopefully this article will continue to evolve as well. Yamaguchi先生 00:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.