Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural depictions of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus; default to keep. &mdash; Coren (talk) 00:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Disclaimer: non-admin close.

Cultural depictions of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a directory of loosely associated topics. Also, most of the content of this list is not veriafiable and/or overly vague. Mrs. Kennedy is notable, but the cultural depictions are not. Tomj 14:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks like trivia. Anything worth keeping can be merged into main article. It's just going to be a trivia magnet otherwise. -- Beloved freak  14:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:IINFO. If kept, rename to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis in popular culture (currently a redirect to this page)--if we're going to keep some of these trivia lists around, let's at least have consistency in naming them. -- Finngall   talk  15:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete but at the very least rename, since the title does not reflect the contents at all; which are a laundry list of trivia loosely connected to Jackie O. --Haemo 22:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep While this could stand a good deal of editing, it's not beyond salvaging. It accurately shows the many depictions of "Jackie Kennedy" and "Jackie O", who is undeniably a pop culture figure.  Her image (how many of us think of a pink outfit and matching pillbox hat at the mere mention of her name?) became bigger than the person herself.  I hope that she's never portrayed in a video game.  Mandsford 17:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and edit. Th nom is using his own peculiar idea of loosely associated--the subject of a depiction is not loosely associated with it. Different let us say photographs of a person are closely associated. Different films, books, songs, etc about a person of principally inspired by a person are tightly, not loosely associated. Thats the way encyclopedias are made--my collecting information associated with subjects. DGG (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and edit. We must make it more similar to the article about cultural depictions of Anne Frank, with more verified and reliable sources. Bryan Seecrets 05:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge  with Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis article. Harlowraman 23:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.