Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural depictions of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 07:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Cultural depictions of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - Wikipedia is not a trivia collection. This article has little or nothign to do with "cultural depictions" of Mozart or his music. It is instead a few apparently random facts thrown together with no sort of unifying theme or premise, which material is already covered adequately in the article for the composer. Otto4711 12:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per as a trivial list of... well... trivia.  Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 12:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed. Read through the article; it's horrid. For everyone saying "Don't delete; improve!" -- the sheer length of time that this has stood here idle tells us that nobody is in the mood to completely revamp the list. Other the other hand, if the article is deleted w/o prejudice for recreating, it would certainly have a stronger tendency to turn into a legitimate rewrite. Bulldog123 13:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mozart and Salieri. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because this particular article does not have substantial content. As collections of minor cultural references go, this is pretty bad--there's a lot more that would be better worth an article. This one is not worth improving. The list of films can fit in the main article if it isnt there already.   DGG (talk) 00:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Otto and Bulldog. Even DGG and I can't bring ourselves to find anything to like about this one.  It's a list of films, followed by a list of trivia.  Horrid is an apt description. Mandsford 15:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.