Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural diversism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Core desat 05:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Cultural diversism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:N, WP:V nothing on google, "Wikipedia is not for things made up by the local parson"? Anarchia (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research / non-notable. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletions.   —Anarchia (talk) 18:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of currency.  Powers T 18:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, no sources. Jack ?! 19:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism. I got the same grand total of 0 Google hits. Blueboy96 20:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The site's author has tried to blank the discussion, and also tried to remove the AFD tag from the article. Good faith can no longer be assumed. Blueboy96 23:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The ideas in this article are true and Joe Nelson is actually making a "temple" in Stafford, VA. Just because its not on google, it doesnt mean the article is false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.6.1.56 (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Then please provide some reliable, independent sources stating as much. Right now we have no way of knowing any of this is true beyond your say-so.  Only slightly less importantly, we have no way of knowing whether the ideas in this article are notable; again, we need reliable independent sources to determine that.  Find some, and the article may be kept.  Powers T 23:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.