Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural radicalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Ingoolemo talk 05:43, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Cultural radicalism
dicdef & inherently pov &hearts;&hearts;purpl  e  feltangel  &hearts;  &hearts;  00:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, needs expanding but could certainly be more than dicdef Flapdragon 01:13, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article is certainly problematic at the moment. However, a Google search shows that a number of books have been written on the subject see . I would vote to keep a decent stub on the subject. Capitalistroadster 03:26, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Clean up as well. -- NS LE  ( Commu nicate! ) < Contribs > 05:46, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to Paleoconservatism Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   06:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete this is an impregnable mass of hokey --Isolani 10:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Needs some clean up and more context. PJM 14:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Trollderella 20:01, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and flag for cleanup. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 21:33, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite - a inaccurate definition (what does the author mean by "supporting liberties in a cultural setting"? what does the author make of conservative anti-tax radicals or free-market fundamentalist neo-liberals then? Weren't Nazis and Communists cultural radicals? and What Would Jesus Do?). The "any society" statement is too sweeping and the article needs supporting references. But the article could be worth keeping if "radically" cleaned up. To avoid POV, a neutral sociological approach rather than the liberals vs. conservatives oversimplification might be more appropriate. Bwithh 21:41, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * weak delete pending expansion, if so done then change vote to keep. Klonimus 23:16, 5 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.