Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culture for Pigeon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was } Keep - newly discovered sources establish notability, no counter argument presented. Wily D 08:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Culture for Pigeon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUMS. Found no coverage in Google search of news and books. Article, as it stands, is essentially a track list. And unsourced. Bbb23 (talk) 00:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I also failed to find independent analysis from an appropriate source and the article contains virtually no encyclopedic content. Snow (talk) 06:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 15:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – Sufficient coverage in third-party sources: "Music: best of 2004" in Artforum ; "CD reviews: Tracy and the plastics: culture for pigeon" in Evening Chronicle ; "Little things we like: Tracy and the Plastics", in The Guardian ; "Gripping new psychedelia" in Birmingham Post ; "Art you can dance to: the wild, weird sounds of Tracy + the Plastics are fit for both booty shakers and performance art fans" in The Advocate ; "Culture for Pigeon" in New Internationalist ; and so on. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 18:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Paul Erik, the NI review is a particularly good source for this.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  10:43, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.