Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culture industry thesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to culture industry. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Culture industry thesis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I tried to explain the user that a much better article is at Culture industry, and have tried to make this a redirect a couple times, but he keeps reverting it. -Zeus-uc 20:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Obvious Merge Duplicate page. Subject already exists. --neon white talk 20:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge content with culture industry. The phrase "culture industry thesis" is too specific to be useful, but the material in the article does not fully overlap the culture industry article. Given that  culture industry is rather short, I don't see what harm TsangA8 could see in applying his/her efforts to merging the two and making a somewhat longer, better product. There are most likely copyvio problems in the Culture industry thesis article, as far as the images are concerned. In any event, without the merge, I see little hope for this article's survival.  J L G 4 1 0 4  01:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.   --  fr33k  man   -s-  15:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and salt that seems like the only way to do this that makes sense. --Buridan (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge again. Usually, this is a case for dispute resolution and not for AFD. Revert-warring can be reported to WP:AN3, and page protection can be requested at WP:RFPP to protect the redirect if necessary. If it's also regarding only two users like it is here, a third opinion is also open if editor assistance fails. MuZemike 17:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.