Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culture of Camden, New Jersey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Culture of Camden, New Jersey

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Looks like a copy/paste from Camden,_New_Jersey Gjs238 (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It's a student project but it doesn't appear to contribute much new information or sources. The main article's section could use a trim, but not in duplication like this so I'm not sure what the point is. I'd recommend a redirect or draftify and that the student consult with their teacher and Wikipedia Expert about proper editing and WP:SPLIT procedures. Reywas92Talk 17:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This is not a stand-alone topic. It should be incorporated into the Camden, New Jersey article. Ira Leviton (talk) 21:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SIGCOV. There is no policy argument given, no analysis of sources, to dictate deletion. There is plenty of possible additional material. Bearian (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Obviously every city has sources on its culture, but please compare this page and Camden,_New_Jersey. This is a sloppy copy and paste job that resulted in duplication and little unique content. Of course additional material could be added here or to Camden,_New_Jersey, but it should be a proper split with summary style, not what this is. WP:REDUNDANT and WP:DUPLICATE are policy arguments not to keep the page. Reywas92Talk 20:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Blatant unnecessary copy/paste from Camden,_New_Jersey Gjs238 (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete strictly inferior to Camden,_New_Jersey; if kept as a split of that article there would need to be a new copy-paste from the city article to replace the article contents, which are less thorough and contain non-encyclopedic phrases removed from the main article. Walsh90210 (talk) 15:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete article is a copy/paste from and redundant with Camden,_New_Jersey. Gjs238 (talk) 14:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.