Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culture of Second Life


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Second Life. Content can be merged from history. ansh 666 02:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Culture of Second Life

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, no out-of-universe notability, sources are all unreliable Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 05:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 05:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems like a case of WP:TNT regardless of whether it's independently notable.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a chance of Notoriety outside of Second Life.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect the content that appears to have RS attached to them (notably, that's citation 16--why the claim of "all unreliable"?), if it's not already in Second Life (it does not appear to be). --Izno (talk) 14:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to second life. Note that if we're merging per WP:ATD-M, we can, and often should, bring over interesting and useful non-RS. I've seen erroneous assertions that non-RS cannot be merged on a number of recent occasions, which is troubling and incorrect. Jclemens (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.