Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultured (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Cultured (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find essentially no independent sources, except one or two blogs. The NYT reference given is a general article about the editor, just mentioning the magazine  DGG ( talk ) 11:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete the NYTimes article is a profile of Sarah Harrelson, a wealthy Miami art collector who has founded at least 4 art publications, the annual magazine of Art Basel Miami, one in LA, the one under discussion here, and one other - forgot where. Mentions of these turn up in searches on her name, but no SIGCOV on any of them.   It may be that she could support an article - although to me, sourcing for a BLP looks scant.  What is clear is that this Cultured mag is not notable, fails WP:SIGCOV, although Harrelson appears to be a bit of a force among collectors of contemporary art.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.