Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culwell Flange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Culwell Flange

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article creator contested PROD. Non-notable branded toilet part that fails WP:GNG. Some promotional language here too, but not enough for G11 in my mind. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * How do I make this notable? Everything I have written about is from an outside source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyleaggie2018 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete First, a word to Kyleaggie2018 about the phrase: "make this notable." That is always going to sounds like nails on a chalkboard to AfD editors.  We as editors don't make something notable, we indicate that others have made note of something.  That is, notability is an externally-derived quality, not something that we can add.  That said, the sources, although published by others, are really not independent.  They are really repackaged marketing materials in trade publications.  That means that there isn't significant coverage in independent sources, as the guidelines request.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Closet flange. This is a poorly sourced and promotional article about a specific brand containing non-neutral language such as "It is the only closet flange that seals the floor, creating an impenetrable watertight seal. If installed it can save property owners thousands in water damage." Cullen328  Let's discuss it  08:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; I don't see a need in a redirect as the content is strictly promotional and the article history does not need to be preserved. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.