Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cum spitting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Oral sex.


 * Note: Moved from Talk:Cum spitting, original discussion was on Votes for deletion/archive May 2004.


 * Another contribution by user:141. Delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exploding Boy (talk • contribs) 14:01, 16 February 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. The content is salvagable, and can potentially be worthwhile. Probably needs to be moved to a more appropriate name though. ShaneKing 14:07, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - we don't need a separate article for each variation - Texture 14:09, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see little academic merit in this.  Davidcannon 14:15, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * This might be a section in oral sex, but it doesn't deserve a stand-alone article. Delete. --No-One Jones 14:27, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. it doesn't matter who wrote it. You should judge by the content, not by the contributor. Please don't bite the newcomers. 141 14:40, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. At the utmost, might deserve a minor mention if the "swallowing" stuff gets merged into oral sex. Lupo 15:28, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge with oral sex and redirect, or keep. Meelar 16:56, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge. Mikkalai 18:37, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the we change all titles with the slang word &quot;cum&quot; in them to &quot;semen&quot;. Note: this is not a content vote, but a format vote. Davodd 19:06, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to felatio. RickK 21:52, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete article yes. But not the content. Content must be moved to Oral sex or felatio. Kingturtle 00:10, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * KEep. Content is valid, and it is a common slang term for a common practise.  even if one were to change the name to something less vulgur, what would htat be?--Mishac 08:30, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. We might as well have separate articles for variations on feces if we're going to do so for fellatio. --Faradn 09:48, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I haven't read the content, but if it has any factual info merge it with fellatio or oral sex and get rid of this article along with it's companion. It doesn't merit an article of its own because it can't be more than a stub. KJ 09:52, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * "Cum spitting" can hardly be called sexual practice. If it could, one would expect to see personal ads from cum spitters and people who like having their cum spat.  This is equivalent to "nose blowing" or "mouth rinsing" and does not warrant its own page.  Merged with the "oral sex" article, it might deserve one sentence of its own. Exploding Boy 01:27, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * This cannot be called a sexual practice. If anything it should be integrated into the below, but it certainly doesn't need its own page. Exploding Boy 14:11, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge with oral sex and delete. Bearcat 10:18, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * DeleteAY 04:35, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.